BrandNameQuestionnaireResults

And the winner is:

FOSWIKI

Free and Open Source Wiki

Now, GET WILD wink

First preference

Name Percentage Absolute
foswiki 24.00% 24
contutto 15.00% 15
cocomint 14.00% 14
lewiki 12.00% 12
youdit 10.00% 10
coolabora 9.00% 9
librett 8.00% 8
powerpaper 5.00% 5
powowiki 3.00% 3

Second preference

Name Percentage Absolute
coolabora 17.00% 17
foswiki 15.00% 15
librett 13.00% 13
contutto 12.00% 12
lewiki 11.00% 11
powerpaper 11.00% 11
youdit 10.00% 10
cocomint 7.00% 7
powowiki 4.00% 4

1st or 2nd preference

votes for names as first or second choice
Name Percentage Absolute
foswiki 39.00% 39
contutto 27.00% 27
coolabora 26.00% 26
lewiki 23.00% 23
librett 21.00% 21
cocomint 21.00% 21
youdit 20.00% 20
powerpaper 16.00% 16
powowiki 7.00% 7

Least preferred

Name Percentage Absolute
powowiki 26.00% 26
cocomint 23.00% 23
powerpaper 13.00% 13
contutto 11.00% 11
youdit 11.00% 11
coolabora 10.00% 10
foswiki 4.00% 4
librett 1.00% 1
lewiki 1.00% 1

Combined preference

sum of 1st preference (2 points), 2nd preference (1 point), least preferred (-2 points)
Name Score
foswiki 55
lewiki 33
librett 27
contutto 20
coolabora 15
youdit 8
powerpaper -5
cocomint -11
powowiki -42

Average score of names on questionnaire

orderd by combined preference score
Name Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6
foswiki 3.69 4.72 3.92 3.83 3.40 3.44
lewiki 3.32 3.82 3.34 3.49 3.04 3.35
librett 2.89 3.06 2.95 3.51 3.19 3.24
contutto 2.94 3.15 2.78 3.05 2.92 2.85
coolabora 3.27 4.02 3.23 3.11 3.50 3.17
youdit 3.12 3.30 2.93 2.89 2.96 2.93
powerpaper 2.84 3.23 2.88 3.63 3.25 3.24
cocomint 3.03 2.49 2.53 2.50 3.18 2.68
powowiki 2.10 3.02 2.38 2.12 2.34 2.36

Questions were:
  1. Please indicate your first impression of each name.
  2. How would you evaluate each name based on its compatibility with the concept?
  3. How would you evaluate each name based on how its ability to represent a product that is better than the original TWiki?
  4. How would you evaluate each name based on its suitability for professional customers?
  5. How would you evaluate each name based on its ability to represent an innovative product?
  6. How would you evaluate each name based on its ability to represent a product that is a leader in its area ?

scores.png

BasicForm edit

TopicClassification MarketingWork
Topic Summary
Interested Parties
Related Topics
Topic attachments
I Attachment Action Size Date Who Comment
scores.pngpng scores.png manage 19 K 18 Nov 2008 - 21:41 MichaelDaum  
Topic revision: r5 - 11 Nov 2010, MichaelDaum - This page was cached on 17 Dec 2017 - 11:06.

The copyright of the content on this website is held by the contributing authors, except where stated elsewhere. See Copyright Statement. Creative Commons License